Sunday, 2 January 2011

Some Current Thoughts on iPad vs Paper Magazines


Since getting an iPad last year I've steadfastly avoided buying magazines. 


Previously, I'd spend quite a lot on magazines across a range of topics from tech through music through walking through politics, economics, design, etc. 

The thing is, the iPad is so good for media consumption that I never run out of interesting things to browse, read or share across those topics and many others. What's more, by abstaining from magazine purchase, I have been adding to my cost-justification for purchasing the iPad in the first place (kinda).


That said, I already had subscriptions running for WiReD and New Scientist before I bought the iPad and they're still running. I look forward to their arrival in the mailbox. Out of curiosity, I bought the first US WiReD iPad app, just to check it out, but since then I haven't bothered, as I get the paper one pushed through my door and that, in itself, is a design classic.

Where I've certainly cut back is on music mag purchase... I'd often have a Wire or a Word or a Mojo or an NME or something tucked in my bag. Since the iPad, not a one. I've replaced this with various alternative sources of music news and knowledge, through Twitter, many RSS feeds and great great weekly emails from independent record shops such as Piccadilly Records in Manchester who do an excellent job in curating their ever-changing stock for customers.

However, I was tempted to pick up the latest copy of Mojo the other day, predominantly for the cover-mounted CD. This month it's retread of of Neil Young's Harvest, featuring several of my favourite acts from recent months and years like Phosphorescent, Jane Weaver, Smoke Fairies and Villagers.

Now, the CD is actually worth the investment (£4.50), which is good because these tribute-style CDs can be pretty disposable. This one isn't. I'm listening to the Smoke Fairies doing Alabama right now. However, on flicking though the magazine itself, I realised that there's a quality to the way it communicates with me which would be hard to replicate on the iPad.

Like many people, my first flick through a magazine is often from the back to the front - this is something to do with the way our brain works. This hasn't been considered by iPad magazines yet, I don't believe. After that, I'll take a more leisurely stroll through the pages from front to back investigating the shorter newsy gossipy bits at the front before considering which longer pieces I fancy tackling later over a cup of tea. [a sort of analogue Read It Later function - I stop short of putting fluorescent stickies to mark the pages for easy reference but I have to fight the temptation ;)].

I'll then pick it up and put it down several times over the next few weeks. Once or twice I'll flick through just to read the ads for forthcoming gigs, tours and releases. In fact there's some pleasure in the type of ads carried by these magazines, they're sometimes useful beacons for fun to be had later in the year.

I can't imagine carving out time to browse a standalone ad section in an iPad magazine. Those iPad magazines I do have see me whizzing through the ads as quickly as poss, and quite why I'd want this experience extending through video and added FAQs I've no idea. However, that could be because the quality end of the music mag market has yet to really venture into this space, and there's an element of the advertising that they carry that can be relevant and interesting to me, rather than the aspirational claptrap in, for example, Project, Richard Branson's latest hobby which I only picked up because it's free over Christmas [review: dull, over-choreographed, hard to navigate].

So what have I learned?
  • I love my iPad.
  • I still enjoy some paper magazines.

Quality music magazines preparing tablet versions have some additional challenges to match the romance of their paper equivalents. [I have to say, Zinio may be the simplest and best platform here, as it affords a simple flick through from front to back... the option to deliver cover-mounted content via iTunes might also be worth a thought].

In closing off this ramble I should also mention the great NPR app developed by Bottle Rocket for distributing news, culture and music content via the iPad and iPhone. It really is understated excellence and, whilst it doesn't attempt to emulate a magazine, it has found some nifty methods for building rich content and social tools into the whole delivery experience. Publishers could learn lots here and, to be fair, probably are doing.

What are your thoughts?

Friday, 10 December 2010

Hipstamatic vs Instagram - FIGHT!


Well I see that Hipstamatic has been named by Apple as the iPhone app of the year, even though Instagram is the retro photo app that everyone is talking about and, more importantly, using.

Hipstamatic and a slew of similar apps have been written-off by several sniffy photographer types as 'the comic sans of photography'. I kinda know what they mean.

On the one hand, these apps give any old novice iPhone owner the chance to create and share nostalgic looking square-framed photos with the minimum of effort. They spend a fraction of the time a professional photographer might spend trying to achieve similar (although obviously much more worthy!) shots. Trouble is, so many people are using the same apps with the same limited range of filters, that everyone's pics all begin to resemble everyone else's... sort of dumbing down the whole effect... hence the 'comic sans' slur.

Either way, given that the best camera is the one you have with you, the outcome of all this is that, of the millions of digital snaps taken on iPhones each day, an increasingly large proportion of them are at least beginning to look a little bit considered and, er, interesting.

As for, Hipstamatic, well, I have the app along with most of the in-app purchased lenses, films and flash-guns, but, to be honest, I rarely use it. Why?

Well, to be honest,I find it faffy and a little contrived. The whole 1970's Instamatic camera ruse makes the whole thing slow, clunky and hard to use. The excruciating wait whilst 'prints' are 'developed' only adds to the frustration.

By the time you've got to the sharing options in Hipstamatic, well... can you be bothered?

Now with Instagram, only a few short weeks on the App Store, there are even fewer filters available with which to achieve your effects... doubtless more will come, but does it really matter? Not really, because Instagram is not really competing head-on with photo-effect apps such as Hipstamatic.

For me Instagram is social network first, camera app second.

When I first started using Instagram I didn't bother creating a network within it, likening it to Location check-in apps like Foursquare and Gowalla within which you can build a somewhat pointless personal network. Why pointless? Well, more often than not, important check-ins will be shared with your Twitter and Facebook networks which, for many people, are much more established and important.

So, I thought, I don't need another redundant network within Instagram, when the app makes it so easy to share photos on Twitter, Facebook and Flickr. This is when I realised that Instagram isn't competing with camera apps. The social network drives the whole thing, and whilst sharing across your favourite, established social sites is easy and important, nurturing an interesting network within the Instagram app itself is very rewarding.

Checking your feed, you'll see the latest shots from the contacts you follow and have the opportunity to comment on or 'like' their work, as well as reading and responding to comments from your own followers (notification that 'you've got comments' is a missing feature... expect it'll show up in a future release).

You can look at the most popular Instagram pictures too and it's here that you realise that many users seem to be playing the numbers game by creating vast networks. This 'gaming' of Instagram could make the whole experience somewhat joyless, as myexperience is that networks of sub-100 followers tend to encourage more conversation and community. I'm not averse to growing my network a little larger (certainly larger than the 50 limit insisted upon by even newer social photo app Path... which I don't understand either) but I'm not in a race.

I should say that there has also been some discussion within Instagram about whether photos created outside of the app should be allowed on the 'most popular' list.

This is because the app lets you select photos from iPhone library for upload, any of which can be take with other apps, other cameras or even be saved from elsewhere on the web.

Driving this discussion was a concern that people may be stealing other people's copyright images in order to get themselves onto the 'most popular' list. I'm sure at least one or two of the thousands of Instagram users have tried this. I haven't and neither would I.

However, I have used images taken by myself in other apps and using other cameras. Some of these I have edited in other apps before importing them into Instagram. Others, I have post-edited in Instagram itself before sharing. These, are my own work and a reserve the right to share them.

So there you have it. Turns out I had much more to say on Hipstamatic vs Instagram than I thought I did.

Do you use either of these apps? Which do you prefer? Why?

Does anyone prefer Path?

Top Ten Tracks of 2010


I'm conscious that this list of the best tracks of 2010 looks as if it was compiled by a different person to the one who put out an albums of the year list earlier on.

Well, I make no apologies.

Here is my list, in reverse:

7. Black Eyed Peas - The Time (Dirty Bit)
6. Duck Sauce - Barbra Streisand
5. Cheryl Cole - Promise This
3. The Fall - Bury! PTS 2+4
2. Cee-Lo Green - Fuck You

1. Katy Perry - Firework

Top Ten Albums of 2010

In my head I'd put The Unthanks' Here's The Tender Coming as my Album of the Year for 2009. Looking back, I'd actually put it third, with Fever Ray and The xx above it. I'd probably swap them around now with hindsight.

Overall though, I was much more convinced by my Top Ten for last year than I am by this year's, other than my Number One.


Other than my definitive number one, Agnes Obel, these albums could be in any order.

Anyway, here goes, in reverse:

10. Sleigh Bells - Treats
9. Teeth Of the Sea - Your Mercury
8. Smoke Fairies - Through Low Light and Trees
7. Solar Bears - She Was Coloured In
5. Tracey Thorn - Love and its Opposite
4. Jane Weaver - The Fallen By Watchbird
3. Phosphorescent - Here's To Taking It Easy
2. Max Essa - Continental Drift

1. Agnes Obel - Philharmonics

As suggested by @futurebehaviour, here is a single Spotify playlist of my Top 10. Tracey Thorn's album isn't on Spotify for some reason, despite the fact that the singles drawn from it are, so I've included them instead.



Tuesday, 7 December 2010

The Lost Art

When I'm not working on my work laptop which lives behind a corporate firewall and allows me to access internal systems and services, I'm usually using my iPad.

In pre-iPad days, I'd generally be found using one of several PCs around the place, desktop, laptop, netbook etc. Now, other for than specific tasks, they're generally gathering dust as I try to maximise my use of the iPad.

The iPad has changed my behaviour, changed my consumption habits and expenditure patterns. It has provided me with new ways to carry out all of the important things I used to do on different machines.

In the main, these new ways of working represent a distinct improvement on what went before. One changed behaviour which I regret though is the gradual tapering-off of my blogging habit.

Yes, yes,I know there are blogging apps available for the iPad, but they are all flawed. Usually, if you are able to attach a photo to your post at all, it'll be dumped somewhere incongruous in the post, which will be sprawled or centred in some bizarre machine font.

Not good.

By the time you've got on a PC to correct the mess, people have read it and gone away, thinking you're a complete amateur.

So, after a long lay-off, I'm blogging on PC for a while. Good idea?